All three freshman congressmenfrom New Mexico signed on to a letter from fellow freshman Rep. Betsy Markey, a Colorado Democrat, to ask Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to fight for rural communities. In all, 20 of the 32 freshman Democrats signed on to the letter.
The infrastructure of rural economies is in crisis, Markey wrote. The economic recovery and reinvestment plan must invest significantly in maintaining and upgrading infrastructure in rural and other distressed communities, which will create local jobs.
Rep. Ben Ray Lujan of the 3rd Congressional District serves a mostly rural area. The largest city in his district is Santa Fe, which the U.S. Census says had just 72,056 people in 2006.
“The many rural communities in New Mexico need relief as our economy continues to struggle,” said Luján in a statement. “The economic recovery package should include programs and funding that help rural families and create jobs in rural communities. The rural communities in my district need assistance during these difficult economic times, and I will continue to fight to create jobs and get our rural economies back on track.”
Rep. Harry Teagues 2nd Congressional district, like Lujans, is mostly rural.
“Making sure that rural interests are represented as we develop the economic recovery and reinvestment plan is a top priority for me,” said Teague in the statement. “If we can convince leadership to make significant investments in maintaining and upgrading infrastructure in rural communities, we will create local jobs and stimulate local economies.”
As of this writing, the 1st Congressional Districts Rep. Martin Heinrich had not issued a release. He did, however, sign onto the letter.
The text of the letter, including the signatories, is included below.
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
U.S. House of Representatives
H-232, U.S. Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
January 13, 2009
Dear Madam Speaker,
As the 111th Congress begins, we of the freshmen class strongly urge you to consider the many ways in which rural communities can benefit from the national economic recovery and reinvestment plan. Rural areas are among the hardest hit in these tough economic times, and with this economic recovery plan we have an opportunity to provide necessary aid to these communities. We need to ensure that the funding streams contain formulas which make certain that money is funneled directly to rural America. If the funds go through the State, then State governments must be required to allocate equitable portions to rural areas.
The infrastructure of rural economies is in crisis. The economic recovery and reinvestment plan must invest significantly in maintaining and upgrading infrastructure in rural and other distressed communities, which will create local jobs. Among other viable options, the quality of life in rural America can be improved by expanding broadband technology, public transportation, and water and sewage systems.
Rural development funds should also be allocated to benefit local schools, police and fire stations, hospitals and community centers. The USDA reported that rural counties with high educational levels saw more rapid earnings and income growth over the past two decades than counties with lower educational levels. Failure to invest in education may offset or diminish the benefits realized through other investments. Moreover, funding for hospitals and rural and community health care centers is essential because of the enormous responsibility placed on rural family doctors. Because rural areas lack the population base to support many specialty practices, rural physicians are frequently called upon to treat patients across a wide range of specialties.
Assistance to education, health care and other programs is critical if we want all Americans to benefit from this economic recovery and reinvestment plan.